.png)
.png)
AUDITORS' PROFESSIONAL SKEPTISM AND ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUD IN PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM IN MEDAN CITY
Abstract
This research is an empirical study regarding professional skepticism and the ability to detect fraud. This research aims to examine the influence of professional skepticism on the ability to detect fraud.
This research was conducted using a survey method at the Public Accounting Firm in the city of Medan. The unit of analysis is the auditors. Simple linear regression analysis with the help of SPSS Statistics 20 was used to analyze the data.
The findings of this research indicate that professional skepticism has a significant positive effect on the ability to detect fraud. This finding explains that the higher the professional skepticism of auditor the higher the auditor's ability to find fraud so that the possibility of fraud will be smaller.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants / AICPA (2002), “Statement on Auditing Standards”, New York: AICPA.
Arens, Elder, Beasley, Amir (2012), “Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Pendekatan Terintegrasi”, Jilid 1, Edisi 12, Jakarta, Erlangga.
Auditing Standards Boards (2011), “Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor”, New York: ASB.
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V. and Hermanson D. R. (2001), “Top 10 Audit Deficiencies”, Journal of Accountancy, 191 (4): 63-66.
Carpenter, Tina., Durtschi Cindy and Lisa Milici Gaynor (2002), “The Role of Experience in Professional Skepticism, Knowledge Acquisition, and Fraud Detectio”, Journal of Accountancy, 19 (1) : 63-66
Eko Ferry Anggriawan (2014), “Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional dan Tekanan Waktu Anggaran Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di DIY)”, Nominal Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol.3, No. 2.
Gusti, Maghfirah dan Syahril Ali (2008), “Hubungan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor dan Situasi Audit, Etika, Pengalaman serta Keahlian Audit dengan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini oleh Akuntan Publik”, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI, Pontianak.
Handoko Ahmad Try (2022), “Pengaruh Tinggi (Rendahnya) Skeptisme Profesional Dalam Suatu Metode Brainstorming Tim Audit Terhadap Penilaian Tinggi (Rendahnya) Resiko Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia STIE Widya Wiwaha, Vol. 2, No. 2, Juni: 336 – 352.
Hurtt, R., Kathy, Martha M. Eining & David Plumlee (2010), “Development of a Scale to Measure Profesional Skeptisim”, Auditing: A Journal of Practical and Theory 29: 149-171.
International Federation of Accountants (2004), “Annual Report: Developing The Global Profession” : 1-47.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (2012), “Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik”, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Linda Indrawati, Dwi Cahyono, dan Astrid Maharani (2019), “Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi Auditor dan Pelatihan Audit Kecurangan Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan”, International Journal of Social Science and Business. Volume 3, Number 4 :393-402.
Louwers, Timothy J. (2005), “Auditing and Assurance Service”, Pennsylvania State University: McGraw-Hill, Edisi Berilustrasi.
Martin, R. D., dan F. Phillips. (2006), “Aeroscape Lighting, Inc: Linking Business Strategy to Audit Planning”, Issues in Accounting Education 21 (3): 313–321.
Marcellina Widiyastuti dan Sugeng Pamudji. (2009). “Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan”. Value Added: Majalah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Maret – Agustus, Vol 5, No 2; Hal. 52-73.
Noviyanti, S. (2008), “Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. 1, Hal 102-125.
Peterson, B., dan T. A. Buckhoff (2004). “Interstate Business College: A Case Study in Fraud Examination”, Issues in Accounting Education 19 (4): 505–527.
Quadackers, Luc, Tom Groot, dan A. Wright (2009). “Auditors’ skeptical Characteristics and Their Relationship to Skeptical Judgments and Decisions”, United States: Northeastern University.
Rafnes dan Primasari (2020), “Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompetensi Auditor dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan FEB Universitas Budi Luhur, Vol. 9, No. 1: 16-31.
Razae, Z., D.L. Crumbley and R.C. Elmore (2004), “Forensic Accounting Education”, Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, Vol. 6: 193-231.
Sabeni, A. (2006), “Faktor Utama Tata Kelola Perusahaan Kurang Baik”, Harian Suara Merdeka, Edisi Jumat 11 Agustus, Semarang.
Sanjaya, Aviani (2017), “Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesionalisme, Independensi, Kompetensi, Pelatihan Auditor, dan Resiko Audit Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan”, Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, Vol. 15, No.1, Hal. 77-93.
Subiyanto B., Digdowiseiso K., dan Mandasari N. (2022), “Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional, dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mengungkapkan Kecurangan/Fraud (Studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jakarta Pusat dan Jakarta Selatan)”, Fair Value-Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansidan Keuangan, Vol 4, No. 6, Januari: 2609-2620.
Suzy Noviyanti (2008). “Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Fraud”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Juni, Vol 8, No 1, Hal. 102-125.
Tuanakotta (2013), “Berpikir Kritis Dalam Auditing”, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37403/sultanist.v12i1.581
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 SULTANIST: Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan
SULTANIST: Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan is indexed by:
Publisher:
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sultan Agung, Surabaya Street No.19, Proklik Village, West Siantar District, Pematangsiantar, North Sumatra, Indonesia, 21118. E-mail: sultanist@stiesultanagung.ac.id
